KAIS AI Search Visibility Barometer · Fertility & IVF · Bangkok · July 2026Ed. 1 · 4 engines

Fertility & IVF in Bangkok: which providers do AI search engines recommend?

An observational study of 35 questions phrased from the perspective of an international patient, measured across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Meta AI. The results describe visibility observed in this panel at the collection date; they do not measure medical quality, safety or clinical outcomes.

35patient questions
4AI engines
140question × engine cells
34clinics cited
27 %of Perplexity sources = portals
The 5 takeaways

Five observations from the fertility panel

1 · A two-name summit — Safe ahead, Jetanin surges

On the full grid, Safe Fertility Center (KVS 100) clearly leads Bumrungrad (79.4): the reference specialist clinic passes the default hospital reflex. Behind them, Bangkok Hospital (50.9) and Prime (41.9) form a second tier — and Jetanin (41.3) jumps to 5th, carried by the general queries. The score differences narrow considerably across the rest of the ranking.

2 · Specialisation beats size

On procedure queries (ICSI, egg freezing, FET…), it's Prime Fertility — a clinic, not a hospital — that leads. In this panel, procedure-specific queries favour some specialist providers more strongly than general queries. This association should be tested over time; it does not, by itself, establish causation.

3 · Genea: the brand that siphons citations

Genea / GenPrime, the Australian-rooted brand, is cited 18 times across all 4 engines (KVS 17.8) — right into the Australian queries where its "RTAC" DNA resonates. For brands with similar names, this pattern warrants monitoring for possible entity confusion in generated answers.

4 · The legal framework: the ownerless category

All five legal questions (foreigners, single women, same-sex couples, surrogacy, sex selection) are ghost or near-empty — two with no clinic cited anywhere, three with at most 3 clinics — while Konkai and PlacidWay lurk in the answers. In this measurement, these questions contain relatively few direct references to fertility providers.

5 · The invisible layer: the sources

27 % of the sources Perplexity cites (121 of 443) are portals and listicles — Bookimed, PlacidWay, Konkai, CleverThai… and ChatGPT leans on the same middlemen (MediGence, Best Clinic Abroad, Infertility Aide). Even when a clinic is named, a portal often supplied the cited material. This highlights the potential importance of third-party sources in retrieval, without demonstrating that any single source causes a recommendation.

The ranking

The AI Visibility Ranking (KVS)

Relative index out of 100 combining citation rank, appearance frequency and multi-engine coverage, then normalised to the leader of this study. KVS is not a probability of recommendation, market share or measure of medical quality.

#ClinicKVS /100Citations1st placesEngines
1 Safe Fertility CenterClinic
100.0
6623
2 Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF ClinicHospital
79.4
5722
3 Bangkok Hospital Fertility CenterHospital
50.9
4010
4 Prime Fertility CenterClinic
41.9
289
5 Jetanin InstituteClinic
41.3
2711
6 Superior A.R.T.Clinic
25.4
214
7 Samitivej Fertility CenterHospital
22.5
250
8 LRC Fertility ClinicClinic
21.4
205
9 Bangkok Central Clinic (BCC IVF)Clinic
21.3
173
10 VFC Center (Vejthani)Hospital
19.5
182
11 Genea / GenPrime GeneaClinic
17.8
182
12 Deep & Harmonicare IVF CenterClinic
16.2
162
13 First Fertility PGD CenterClinic
13.8
180
14 Bangkok IVF Center (BIC)Clinic
13.1
171
15 N.I.C IVF ClinicClinic
12.5
150
16 Takara IVF BangkokClinic
9.6
121
17 AGG — BookimedAggregator
9.4
92
18 AGG — KonkaiAggregator
7.6
90
19 AGG — PlacidWayAggregator
7.0
44
20 Smile IVFClinic
6.0
71
21 Siam Fertility ClinicClinic
5.8
101
22 Inspire IVFClinic
3.7
70
27 Genesis Fertility Center (GFC)Clinic
2.3
40

Dots = ChatGPT · Gemini · Perplexity · Meta AI (filled = cited at least once). Red rows = aggregators capturing citations in place of clinics. Gold row = Genesis Fertility Center (GFC): 4 citations across the 140 question × engine cells, never in the top three.

By query category

How visibility differs by query category

A global ranking hides an important point: each family of questions has a different competitive structure, with more stable leadership in some areas and low citation density in others.

General

Tested

4 queries — The default reflex of a patient discovering the market

  1. Safe Fertility Center366 pts
  2. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic283 pts
  3. Prime Fertility Center164 pts

Safe × Bumrungrad duopoly by volume — no engine agrees on the #1

Procedures

Tested

6 queries — ICSI, egg freezing, IUI, PGT, FET, male fertility

  1. Safe Fertility Center257 pts
  2. Prime Fertility Center237 pts
  3. Bangkok Hospital Fertility Center209 pts

Specialisation beats size — Prime leads

Success rates

Tested

4 queries — The IVF patient's #1 criterion — including 40+, low AMH

  1. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic226 pts
  2. Safe Fertility Center214 pts
  3. Bangkok Hospital Fertility Center164 pts

Bumrungrad ahead — but ChatGPT cites even small clinics (BIC #1 on one query)

Price

Low citation density

3 queries — Costs, packages, international comparison

  1. Bangkok Hospital Fertility Center150 pts
  2. First Fertility PGD Center61 pts
  3. Bangkok Central Clinic (BCC IVF)60 pts

Nearly empty — a hospital wins on its published packages

Trust

Tested

4 queries — Safety, accreditation, how to choose, reviews

  1. Safe Fertility Center237 pts
  2. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic214 pts
  3. Jetanin Institute138 pts

Safe leads, but leadership remains fragmented

Legal framework

Low citation density

5 queries — Foreigners, single women, same-sex couples, surrogacy, sex selection

  1. Safe Fertility Center95 pts
  2. AGG — PlacidWay70 pts
  3. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic70 pts

All 5 queries ghost or near-empty — only aggregators lurk here

Comparisons

Low citation density

3 queries — Thailand vs Malaysia, India, Spain/Greece

  1. Safe Fertility Center70 pts
  2. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic60 pts
  3. World Fertility Services35 pts

Long answers, almost no clinic named

Source markets

Tested

4 queries — Chinese, Arabic-speaking, Australian, expat patients

  1. Safe Fertility Center226 pts
  2. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic182 pts
  3. Bangkok Hospital Fertility Center140 pts

Some source-market associations are visible, but leadership remains fragmented

Logistics

Tested

2 queries — Length of stay, English-speaking doctor

  1. Safe Fertility Center113 pts
  2. Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic103 pts
  3. Bangkok Hospital Fertility Center43 pts

Bumrungrad leads the English-speaking-doctor query, while coverage remains split across engines

Coverage

Cross-engine coverage as a robustness signal

Repeated appearance across four engines can reinforce perceived familiarity, although this study does not measure patient behaviour. Only 9 clinics out of 34 make the clean sweep: Safe Fertility Center · Bumrungrad Fertility & IVF Clinic · Bangkok Hospital Fertility Center · Prime Fertility Center · Jetanin Institute · Samitivej Fertility Center · VFC Center (Vejthani) · Genea / GenPrime Genea · Deep & Harmonicare IVF Center. At the other end, 5 clinics exist on a single engine only. Case in point: Genesis Fertility Center — 4 citations out of 140, never in the top three, consistently in position 5 when ChatGPT mentions it. Being present in one engine is not the same as having broad, stable visibility across the panel.

Methodology

How these numbers are made

Protocol. 35 questions phrased in a patient's voice (never "rank the 10 best clinics"), across 9 categories: general, procedures, success rates, price, trust, legal framework, destination comparisons, source markets, logistics. Asked in fresh sessions, web search on, across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Meta AI — July 2026.

  • 140 question × engine cells: a complete grid, every engine at 35/35, no cell extrapolated. Each cell was measured three times under the protocol described below. Measurement anecdote: on the first pass Gemini returned a plain error on "IVF cost in Bangkok" ("I encountered an error"); the query was re-run and now yields a full costed answer — the incident shows how unstable engine responses are from one session to the next.
  • Counting. A clinic named in the answer = cited, in order of appearance (6 positions max). A clinic's own site cited as a source counts for the clinic; a portal cited as a recommendation or dominant source counts as an aggregator.
  • KVS. Rank weighting 35 / 25 / 18 / 12 / 8 / 3, a coverage bonus of +8 % per additional engine, normalised to the leader. KVS is a relative visibility index within this panel; it does not measure recommendation probability, medical quality, safety or clinical success rates.
  • Source analysis. On Perplexity answers, every bibliographic reference was classified: 121 of 443 sources (27 %) are matchmaking portals or medical-tourism listicles.

Limitations. This is an observational study of engine outputs at a specific point in time. It does not establish that a particular page, source or optimisation causes a citation, and it should not be used as a medical recommendation or quality ranking.

Is your clinic in the answers?

KAIS measures AI-search visibility, the sources used by engines, competitor gaps and information risks. The engine panel is adapted to the target market and defined before the engagement. No citation or ranking is guaranteed.

View KAIS diagnostics