KAIS Barometer · AI Visibility · 2026 Edition

Law firms in Paris & Lyon, as AI engines see them

An observational study of law-firm visibility across Gemini, Meta AI and Perplexity: 80 queries, 240 question × engine cells, 640 citations and 232 firms named. The results describe the panel measured on 30 June 2026; they do not measure legal quality or case outcomes.

80queries
240consolidated answers
640citations
232firms named
3AI engines

Direct answer

In this panel, Howard Avocats is the KVS leader in Paris and Facchini Avocat the KVS leader in Lyon. Visibility varies materially by practice area and engine: Reference Rate ranges from 88% in business law to 60% in family law, while the study reports firm citation at only 17% on cost queries.

Howard AvocatsParis KVS leader · 100
Facchini AvocatLyon KVS leader · 100
17%firm citation on cost queries
64%of 232 firms cited only once
01 — Summary

What should a law-firm leader know about AI visibility in the legal market?

Six findings shape the decision in this panel: a clear Paris leader, a highly fragmented long tail, sharply lower citation on pricing queries, material differences by engine, practice-area gaps and a clear Paris–Lyon difference.

What are the six main findings of the 2026 Legal AI Barometer?
FindingMeasureObserved resultSource interpretation
Panel leaderHoward Avocats16 of the 24 consolidated employment-law answers in Paris place Howard Avocats at the top recurrently.The source text presents this repeated association as a strong signal within this precise query set.
Long tail232 firms named148 firms, or 64%, appear only once.The source text distinguishes isolated mentions from recurrent presence.
Cost wall17%Firm citation drops to 17% on pricing questions; Perplexity names no firm on those cost queries.The source describes this as a low-citation area.
Engine differenceGemini 3.1 / Meta AI 1.3Gemini names 3.1 firms per answer in the source indicator; Meta AI names 1.3.The source stresses that visibility differs materially by engine.
Reference Rate88% to 60%Business law 88%, intellectual property 85%, employment law 71%, real estate 71%, family law 60%.Reference Rate is the share of answers that name at least one firm in the practice area.
Paris / Lyon33 vs 17The Bar is cited 33 times in Lyon versus 17 in Paris in the source text.The source interprets this as more frequent fallback to the official directory in Lyon.
02 — Ranking

Which law firms are most visible in AI answers in Paris and Lyon?

Howard Avocats is the Paris KVS leader at 100.0. Facchini Avocat is the Lyon KVS leader at 100.0. The tables below show the next most visible firms in each city.

Which law firms have the highest AI visibility in Paris?
RankFirmPractice areaKVS
1Howard AvocatsEmployment law100.0
2Hoche AvocatsBusiness law44.3
3Kohen AvocatsEmployment law39.1
4Cabinet ZenouEmployment law38.7
5Avi Bitton AvocatsEmployment law37.2
6Cabinet BoucharaIntellectual property35.9
7Cabinet DreyfusIntellectual property32.9
Which law firms have the highest AI visibility in Lyon?
RankFirmPractice areaKVS
1Facchini AvocatReal estate100.0
2Delsart AvocatsIntellectual property86.0
3Bressand AvocatIntellectual property81.3
4Cabinet BoucharaIntellectual property74.9
5Erovic AvocatsEmployment law57.1
6Saône Rhône AvocatsBusiness law57.1
7Cabinet Jonathan KochelEmployment law45.3

KVS is normalised to the panel leader. A score of 100 identifies the measured leader and is neither market share nor a probability of recommendation.

03 — Engines

Do Gemini, Perplexity and Meta AI cite law firms in the same way?

No. In this panel, Gemini names more firms per answer than Meta AI, while Perplexity is the most cautious on cost queries.

How do Gemini, Perplexity and Meta AI differ in the firms they cite?
Engine / segmentReported rateAdditional indicatorDescribed behaviour
Gemini85%3.1 firms / answerBehaves like an enriched directory
Perplexity72%the most cautious0 firms named on cost
Meta AI68%1.3 firms / answerThe stingiest — drifts to generic advice
Cost queries17%Perplexity: 0 firms namedFirm citation on pricing questions
04 — Practice areas

In which practice areas do AI engines name a law firm most often?

Reference Rate is highest in business law (88%), followed by intellectual property (85%). It reaches 71% in employment law and real estate, then 60% in family law.

In which legal practice areas is a law firm most often named by AI?
Practice areaReference RateParis leaderLyon leader
Business law88%Hoche AvocatsFacchini Avocat
Intellectual property85%Cabinet BoucharaDelsart Avocats
Employment law71%Howard AvocatsErovic Avocats
Real estate71%Hoche AvocatsFacchini Avocat
Family law60%DAF Darmon AvocatsStrulovici

KVS

Relative index normalised to the panel leader; KVS 100 identifies the measured leader.

Reference Rate

Share of answers that name at least one firm in the practice area.

Recurrent leadership

Firm repeatedly cited at the top in the described sub-panel.

Fragmented

Leader observed on only one engine of the Gemini + Meta AI text sub-panel.

05 — Queries

On which queries can a law firm actually dominate AI answers?

The panel separates three situations: query territories with recurrent leaders, pricing queries where no firm is recommended, and territories where leadership remains fragmented across engines.

Which query territories already have a recurrent leader?

Six practice-area × city combinations show recurrent leadership in the source text.

On which queries does one law firm lead recurrently?
TerritoryLeaderDetail
Employment law · ParisHoward Avocatsfirst in 10 of the area's reads · 16/24 answers
Family law · LyonStrulovicifirst in 9 of the area's reads
Family law · ParisDAF Darmon Avocatsfirst in 7 of the area's reads
Intellectual property · ParisCabinet Boucharafirst in 6 of the area's reads
Intellectual property · LyonDelsart & Bressandthe two IP specialists on top
Real estate · LyonFacchini Avocatabsolute Lyon leader · KVS 100

Do AI engines recommend a law firm when a prospect asks about price?

Rarely in this measurement: ten cost queries are shown with no firm recommended, and overall firm citation on pricing questions falls to 17%.

Which pricing queries trigger no law-firm recommendation?
QueryPractice areaStatus
how much does a lawyer at the labor court cost in Paris—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer at the labor court cost in Lyon—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer charge to draft a shareholders' agreement in Paris—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer charge to draft a shareholders' agreement in Lyon—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer cost for a real-estate dispute in Paris—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer cost for a real-estate dispute in Lyon—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a divorce with a lawyer cost in Paris—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a divorce with a lawyer cost in Lyon—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer cost for a counterfeiting case in Paris—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one
how much does a lawyer cost for a counterfeiting case in Lyon—No firm recommended; Perplexity: no one

Which queries remain open because no firm has stable leadership?

These territories are fragmented: the observed leader appears on only one engine of the Gemini + Meta AI text sub-panel.

On which queries does no law firm yet dominate consistently?
QueryObserved leaderDominanceStatus
business lawyer ParisAGN Avocats50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
real-estate lawyer ParisKohen Avocats50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
I'm in conflict with my business partner, which lawyer in LyonLamy Lexel50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
dispute with my neighbor over an easement in Paris, who to contactKohen Avocats50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
dispute with my condo management in Lyon, which lawyerMaître Olivia Prélot50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
sudden termination of a business relationship, who to contact in LyonMaître Olivia Prélot50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
I'm facing workplace harassment in Paris, what should I doCabinet Eva Touboul Cohen50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
best employment lawyer in LyonCabinet Denis Janin50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
I want to buy a company in Lyon, which lawyer for the dealLamy Lexel50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
patent dispute, which firm in LyonCabinet Ratheaux50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
my tenant stopped paying rent, how to evict them in LyonFacchini Avocat50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
business lawyer LyonLamy Lexel50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
dispute with my neighbor over an easement in Lyon, who to contactMaître Olivia Prélot50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
real-estate lawyer LyonMaître Olivia Prélot50%Observed leader on 1 engine out of 2
06 — Methodology

How were the Legal AI Barometer results measured?

The protocol covers 80 real-world legal queries, 3 AI engines and 3 runs per question × engine cell, for 720 raw measurements before consolidation.

Sector
Law firms — Paris & Lyon
Recorded
30 June 2026
AI engines
Gemini · Meta AI · Perplexity (equal weighting)
Sample
80 real-world legal queries · 5 practice areas · 4 intents
Actors
232 firms named · 640 citations recorded
Question × engine cells
240 (80 queries × 3 engines)
Repetitions
3 runs per cell, or 720 raw measurements before consolidation
Rank weighting
Rank 1 weighs more than rank 5 (position-weighted CTR)
Coverage bonus
+10% if all 3 engines cite · +3% for 2
Normalization
KVS = 100 × score / leader, per city and practice area
Per-query analysis
Gemini + Meta AI text sub-panel; Perplexity remains included in the aggregate KVS
KaiZen AI Strategy

Is your firm cited on your queries?

KAIS measures and diagnoses law-firm visibility across AI engines. Client monitoring is defined separately from this research panel and no position or citation is guaranteed.

Test my firm’s AI visibility →